|
Following the ruling on the case of Demopoulos vs.Turkey and 7 other cases the European Court of Human Rights on 5 March 2010, the Court upheld that the Immovable Property Commission in North Cyprus was an accessible and effective local remedy for all persons seeking redress and therefore an appropriate forum for deciding on complex matters of property ownership and valuation and assessing financial compensation. |
|
The Commission was set up under the Immovable Property Law (number 67/2005) in accordance with the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey. The purpose of the Commission is to establish an effective domestic remedy for claims relating to abandoned properties in Northern Cyprus after the troubles in 1974. The Commission officially began its activities on 17 March 2006.
Hearing and making a decision
All natural or legal persons claiming rights to movable and immovable properties may bring a claim by way of an application in person or through a legal representative, to the Immovable Property Commission requesting restitution, exchange or compensation for such property.
The Commission, after having heard the arguments of the parties and having examined the documents submitted shall decide as to ? restitution of the immovable property to the person whose right in respect to the property has been established, or ? to offer exchange of the property to the said person, or ? decide as to payment of compensation, or ? where the applicant claims compensation for loss of use and/or non-pecuniary damages in addition to restitution, exchange or compensation in return for immovable property.
To date there has been 459 applications lodged before the Commission, 95 have been concluded through friendly settlement and four cases through formal hearings. The Commission has awarded exchange and compenstion in two cases, restitution in one case and restitution and compensation in five cases. The Commission has paid GBP 40,191,100 to the applicants as compensation.
The Commission has resulted in thousands of people enjoying a fair, fast and cost effective local remedy to their property dispute rather than making applications direct to the European Court of Human Rights which can be very time consuming and expensive.
Right of Appeal
Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of the Commission have the right to apply to the High Administrative Court . If the applicant is not satisfied with the judgment of the High Administrative Court, he may then lodge an application before the European Court of Human Rights but this can be a rather long and expensive process and the Court may uphold the decision of the Commission.
Application procedure
In proceedings bought before the Commissions the burden of proof rests with the applicant who must satisfy the Commission beyond any reasonable doubt as to their rights to the property in order for a decision to be taken in his favour.
Making an application to the Commission can be a complicated matter requiring professional assistance and guidance. To obtain fast and effective remedies to your property disputes it is recommended to use the services of a legal representative based in Northern Cyprus.
The Law Firms we work with gained many years of experience in making applications to the Commission, settling property disputes and representing parties at the High Administrative Court.
We have assisted thousands of people to achieve a fair, fast and cost effective local remedy to their property dispute.
For further advice please contact us at: ipc@cyprus-northern-property.com
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions |
The Immovable Property Commission
Following the ruling on the case of Demopoulos vs.Turkey and 7 other cases the European Court of Human Rights on 5 March 2010, the Court upheld that the Immovable Property Commission in North Cyprus was an accessible and effective local remedy for all persons seeking redress and therefore an appropriate forum for deciding on complex matters of property ownership and valuation and assessing financial compensation.
|
The legal procedure aliens should follow when buying property from the TRNC
For aliens to acquire immovable property in TRNC and becoming ?the owner? on the title deed of the immovable property, it is necessary that some documents (title deed, site plan taken from the authorized office etc), some forms consisting of personal details of the alien are submitted to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and an application in person or via a lawyer is made to the same office.
|
How are the rights of Aliens reserved until the transfer of the title deed?
If the necessary permits from the authorized offices are not ready by the time the title deed is to be transferred, the Alien person and/or Company may have to take some measures to reserve his/its rights because in such a case, although the Alien has paid all the amount due, the title deed of the immovable property is still under the name of the previous owner.
|
About the Annan Plan.
The Annan Plan, which was prepared by United Nations General Secretary Kofi Annan and which until very recently lit the way for the Cyprus problem is for now shelved as a result of a referendum to which Turks said ?yes? and Greeks said ?no?.
|
|
|